Page 1 of 1

Lead Developer is predicting Gnome disaster

Posted: 01 Aug 2012, 02:15
by viking60
ImageBenjamin Otte the guy behind gstreamer and gtk is frustrated about Gnome. They are understaffed and people have left the project. Ubuntu went it's own (disasterous) way and the market has not responded to Gnome as they hoped.
There was nobody gathering arround Gnome3, he complains;in stead there were forks like Cinnamon.
Personally I might add that the Gnome devs did not respond as a lot of us (the market+Linus) hoped. Gnome is a RedHat project and if they pull out then the DE is in trouble.
I guess he needed to went it.
This is not the perfect time to make those kinds of predictions though....
As Linux put it: It is becoming almost usable these days, so the directon fits. And if it is true that the devs are quitting because the supporters of Gnome are scaling back then they have proven that they must be the most tone deaf "unmusical" people on the planet.

People ran away because they FUBARED - not the other way arround. Gnome 2 was a perfect base to work on and lots of people loved it. Gnome 3 did not build on that - Blaming the "market" for that is like asking who has shiten in your pants....

But having thrown the dice - there is only one thing to do: Continue and see to that it will be a success....

Re: Lead Developer is predicting Gnome disaster

Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 02:06
by dedanna1029
An anonymous reader tips an article from Datamation about several suggestions for the GNOME project to answer user complaints and boost developer morale (btw, this link is riddled with ads, fair warning - D).


More at GNOME: Possible Recovery Strategies from Slashdot

Re: Lead Developer is predicting Gnome disaster

Posted: 19 Aug 2012, 10:14
by viking60
Yet with very few changes, GNOME 3 could be much more acceptable to most users. A moveable panel, panel applets, desktop launchers, user control of virtual desktops, menu alternatives that would remove the need for the overview -- all of these could be added easily as options. Together, they would reduce at least ninety percent of the complaints against GNOME 3.

Moreover, this way, GNOME 3 wouldn't be abandoned. It would just be modified to increase user choice -- a direction that would receive few, if any complaints.

+1