viking60 wrote: On this point I simply disagree, but I have no reason to complain about the communication of it.
I understand that this is not among those things that OMA want to correct - I am clearly opposed to that. I do not want to have my vote ignored even if OMA says so up front...
Regarding those other mistakes I have no problem with it - you are willing to improve on it and that is fine.![]()
As you say you are democratically elected - so why don't you simply pick a name (Perfect opportunity to show Colhões!)
That way you can maintain the democratic high-ground. But putting it out for a vote and ignore 60% of the community votes does not entitle you to that.
Why ask.... If you are not going to listen? And what about that poor well meaning guy that actually won the majority ?
[...]
I hope this was constructive and I do agree that this can be done in civilized way (as in:I have a problem with THAT - not with YOU).
Sure it is. I understand you point of view, even when I disagree :-) I just try to make things clear on the process that goes on, explain that we are working and learning.
The name choice will not have a massive voting, the community contribution will be to work on the names, suggest names, discuss around it, and put good arguments on it. The decision, and this is not 100% sure because of council voting running until 2 days, will be taken by Members + Active devs vote, follow by a discussion that I hope to be simple, that will only make official the results. If anyone has any great "blocking" idea, etc... on the winner, that will be discussed, but we will respect the voting the hard we can.
Regarding decision taking, responsivenss, I just can say, we are doing the best we can, and we need all the help available.
I also have no problem with Vikings at all!
