Okay, now for the $1M question. What does it say in top that's taking the power? Flash? Or plugincontainer? With FF 3.5.10, I've got flash being used on several things, and am running at a much cooler 20%, no plugincontainer, and flash isn't crashing on me (although it never used to anyway with no plugincontainer).
FYI - that tweet was perfect. You can do the same with others, just put @<theirname> first in your post. There's also option to direct message on their Twitter pages where it says "Message" - that gets a private message to them. The first doesn't (well, it does, but it does it publicly).
plugincontainer or flash? - nothing but woes.
Moderators: b1o, jkerr82508
-
dedanna1029
- Sound-Berserk
- Posts: 8784
- Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
- Contact:
Re: plugincontainer or flash? - nothing but woes.
I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html
Re: plugincontainer or flash? - nothing but woes.
Ok got it! I have never noticed before - so Direfox has become wores in that aspect.
Got that too -finally:-)
Got that too -finally:-)
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"