![]() | You heard right folks Microsoft is the fifth biggest contributor to the next kernel (3.0).
It is hardly love that has motivated Microsoft to contribute this much:
So Linux is still Communism and Cancer I guess but MS has caught it too. The really encouraging stuff here is that Microsoft is forced to do this in order to stay competitive. Or in Balmers own words: Become a cancer infested Communist. They can say what they want about Linux but even they have to dance after the tunes played by the Linux flute. Not always gracious.... but still dancing.... in a manner of speaking: Ah I just love it..... And to be fair, we have to give credit where credit is due. |
Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
Moderators: b1o, jkerr82508
Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"
Re: Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
Oh yes!
They tried it with the kernel before but the code was rejected by Linus. They have done it with Novell/Suse; they are in the extend phase and about to enter the extinguish phase.
The claim that Microsoft has ownership of part of Linux is actually what Novell is paying for. The claim has no substance what so ever and Microsoft is unable to prove it.
But a good old FUD seems to do the trick.
In this case though MS has realized that they are small germs in the server market and need both Novell and Linux and Suse to compete. The kernel simply has to communicate with MS products if MS wants to stay in the market.
IBM or Redhat would have alternatives ready in no time if MS had not acted.
They tried it with the kernel before but the code was rejected by Linus. They have done it with Novell/Suse; they are in the extend phase and about to enter the extinguish phase.
The claim that Microsoft has ownership of part of Linux is actually what Novell is paying for. The claim has no substance what so ever and Microsoft is unable to prove it.
But a good old FUD seems to do the trick.
In this case though MS has realized that they are small germs in the server market and need both Novell and Linux and Suse to compete. The kernel simply has to communicate with MS products if MS wants to stay in the market.
IBM or Redhat would have alternatives ready in no time if MS had not acted.
Manjaro 64bit on the main box -Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz and nVidia Corporation GT200b [GeForce GTX 275] (rev a1. + Centos on the server - Arch on the laptop.
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"
"There are no stupid questions - Only stupid answers!"
- dedanna1029
- Sound-Berserk
- Posts: 8784
- Joined: 14 Mar 2010, 20:29
- Contact:
Re: Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
There is only one single thing I want from Windows, and that's it. The ability to pause on boot. Otherwise, they can keep their greedy mits off my kernel, thanks (and knowing they haven't really ticks me off). 

I'd rather be a free person who fears terrorists, than be a "safe" person who fears the government.
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html
No gods, no masters.
"A druid is by nature anarchistic, that is, submits to no one."
http://uk.druidcollege.org/faqs.html
Re: Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
Microsoft - the 5th biggest contributor to Linux 3
True... They contribute all kinds of FUD
True... They contribute all kinds of FUD

